From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15705 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 14:07:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 15572 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 14:07:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:06:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKE6FVr008770 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:06:15 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAKE6FH7027422 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:06:15 -0500 Received: from [10.32.10.121] (vpn-10-121.str.redhat.com [10.32.10.121]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKE6DwN017522; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:06:14 -0500 Subject: Re: New Systemtap-0.8 RPM available for testing on Fedora 8 and Fedora 9 From: Mark Wielaard To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: William Cohen , SystemTAP In-Reply-To: References: <49246BEC.2020605@redhat.com> <1227180723.3306.10.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1227189973.3306.29.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 Hi, On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:24 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > mjw wrote: > > > [...] > > I couldn't figure out how to run the tests against the > > systemtap-testsuite package. Would like to run those to see how things > > look in the larger picture. How do you run them from the rpm? > > Install systemtap-testsuite rpm. cd /usr/share/systemtap*/testsuite. > make *check. Doh. That was too easy. Should have figured that out myself. Results of sudo make installcheck look good: Host: Linux dijkstra.wildebeest.org 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 13 20:29:07 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Snapshot: version 0.8/0.137 non-git sources Distro: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) === systemtap Summary === # of expected passes 638 # of unexpected failures 11 # of unexpected successes 9 # of expected failures 199 # of known failures 7 # of untested testcases 4 # of unsupported tests 2 Where the failures are: FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_pid build FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_pid run FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_proc build FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sig_by_proc run FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigkill build FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigkill run FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigmon build FAIL: systemtap.examples/process/sigmon run FAIL: buildok/signal-all-probes.stp - These are all http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7030 "signal tapset may be referring to inline functions" (which has a patch attached) FAIL: gtod (200) - Still need to investigate. FAIL: 32-bit net1 - This is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991 "accept system call missed on 2.6.27" I have given it a thumbs up at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9695 (where I saw Will already posted the above results...) Cheers, Mark