From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2451 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2008 15:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 2364 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2008 15:55:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:54:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBIFsOkH010193 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:54:24 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBIFsNYj017696 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:54:23 -0500 Received: from [10.32.10.106] (vpn-10-106.str.redhat.com [10.32.10.106]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBIFsL8c017383; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:54:22 -0500 Subject: Re: Test results on 2.6.28-rc8 From: Mark Wielaard To: Kris Van Hees Cc: wenji.huang@oracle.com, systemTAP , "ZANNONI,ELENA" In-Reply-To: <20081218155104.GK27522@oracle.com> References: <4949C383.7080507@oracle.com> <1229611756.3441.34.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <20081218155104.GK27522@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1229615661.3441.43.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 Hi Kris, On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 10:51 -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote: > The .sum file is now available for every systemtap_snapshot reported on labrat. > Just look for the 'Download build log' link. Note that it only contains the > .sum file information. I have found the .log very useful in the past for > tracking down test failures, but past discussion within the systemtap group > resulted in objections against using the .log file. If you prefer to have > the .log available, we can definitely start doing that going forward (as we > used to do that in the past anyway). Thanks! But indeed the testsuite/systemtap.log file would be more useful. So if you could include that, that would be highly appreciated. Cheers, Mark