From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-12227-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2009 09:37:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 20792 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2009 09:36:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:36:47 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3T9agjK030134; 	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:36:42 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3T9afJL010465; 	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:36:41 -0400
Received: from [10.32.10.142] (vpn-10-142.str.redhat.com [10.32.10.142]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3T9aes0016136; 	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:36:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Systemtap snap:b6371390 test on kernel 2.6.30-rc3-git2
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
To: Pavan Naregundi <pavan.naregundi@in.ibm.com>
Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF7F01BC7C.C3DE65C3-ON652575A6.001DF96D-652575A6.00212F6D@in.ibm.com>
References:  	 <OF427B251C.86F0F551-ON652575A5.00402B4D-652575A5.0040F12A@in.ibm.com> 	 <1240843370.4387.45.camel@fedora.wildebeest.org> 	 <OF7F01BC7C.C3DE65C3-ON652575A6.001DF96D-652575A6.00212F6D@in.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:37:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1240997799.2389.5.camel@fedora.wildebeest.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 11:30 +0530, Pavan Naregundi wrote:
> Running /home/pavan/systemtap/src/testsuite/systemtap.base/cast.exp ...
> executing: stap /home/pavan/systemtap/src/testsuite/systemtap.base/cast.stp
> -g
> FAIL: systemtap.base/cast.stp
> line 4: expected "tv_sec OK"
> Got "tv_sec 42 != 0"
> testcase /home/pavan/systemtap/src/testsuite/systemtap.base/cast.exp
> completed in 8 seconds

That is strange, maybe struct timeval is different on ppc64 from what we
expect in the @cast or get_timeval() in the script. Maybe Josh has a
hunch what is going on (he wrote the test originally).

Cheers,

Mark