* [PATCH] A new tapset that adds support for tty and serial devices
@ 2009-10-20 18:10 leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] A new testcase for tty tapset leitao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: leitao @ 2009-10-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
A new tapset that supports tty devices and consequently serial
devices. It is just a basic implementation that can be extended
as demands appears
---
tapset/tty.stp | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tapset/tty.stp
diff --git a/tapset/tty.stp b/tapset/tty.stp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73d7d91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tapset/tty.stp
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+// tty tapset
+// Copyright (C) 2009 IBM Corp.
+//
+// Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+//
+// This file is part of systemtap, and is free software. You can
+// redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General
+// Public License (GPL); either version 2, or (at your option) any
+// later version.
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.open - Called when a tty is opened
+ * @inode_number: the inode number
+ * @inode_state: the inode state
+ * @inode _flags: the inode flags
+ * @file_name : the file name
+ * @file_mode : the file mode
+ * @file_flags : the file flags
+ */
+probe tty.open = kernel.function("tty_open") {
+ inode_number= $inode->i_ino
+ inode_state = $inode->i_state
+ inode_flags = $inode->i_flags
+
+ file_name = d_name($filp->f_path->dentry)
+ file_mode = $filp->f_mode
+ file_flags = $filp->f_flags
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.release - Called when the tty is closed
+ * @inode_number: the inode number
+ * @inode_state: the inode state
+ * @inode _flags: the inode flags
+ * @file_name : the file name
+ * @file_mode : the file mode
+ * @file_flags : the file flags
+ */
+probe tty.release = kernel.function("tty_release") {
+ inode_number= $inode->i_ino
+ inode_state = $inode->i_state
+ inode_flags = $inode->i_flags
+
+ file_name = d_name($filp->f_path->dentry)
+ file_mode = $filp->f_mode
+ file_flags = $filp->f_flags
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.resize - Called when a terminal resize happens
+ * @name: the tty name
+ * @old_row: the old row value
+ * @old_col: the old col value
+ * @old_ypixel: the old ypixel
+ * @old_xpixel: the old xpixel
+ * @new_row: the new row value
+ * @new_col: the new col value
+ * @new_ypixel: the new ypixel value
+ * @new_xpixel: the new xpixel value
+*/
+probe tty.resize = kernel.function("tty_do_resize"){
+ name = kernel_string($tty->name)
+ old_row = $tty->winsize->ws_row
+ old_col = $tty->winsize->ws_col
+ old_ypixel = $tty->winsize->ws_ypixel
+ old_xpixel = $tty->winsize->ws_xpixel
+
+ new_row = $ws->ws_row
+ new_col = $ws->ws_col
+ new_ypixel = $ws->ws_ypixel
+ new_xpixel = $ws->ws_xpixel
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.ioctl - called when a ioctl is request to the tty
+ * @name: the file name
+ * @cmd: the ioctl command
+ * @arg: the ioctl argument
+ */
+probe tty.ioctl = kernel.function("tty_ioctl"){
+ name = kernel_string($file->f_path->dentry->d_iname)
+
+ cmd = $cmd
+ arg = $arg
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.init - Called when a tty is being initalized
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @name: the driver .dev_name name
+ * @module: the module name
+ */
+probe tty.init = kernel.function("tty_init_dev"){
+ driver_name = kernel_string($driver->driver_name)
+ name = kernel_string($driver->name)
+ module = kernel_string($driver->owner->name)
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.register - Called when a tty device is registred
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @name: the driver .dev_name name
+ * @module: the module name
+ * @index: the tty index requested
+ */
+probe tty.register = kernel.function("tty_register_device"){
+ driver_name = kernel_string($driver->driver_name)
+ name = kernel_string($driver->name)
+ module = kernel_string($driver->owner->name)
+ index = $index
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.unregister - Called when a tty device is being unregistered
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @name: the driver .dev_name name
+ * @module: the module name
+ * @index: the tty index requested
+ */
+probe tty.unregister = kernel.function("tty_unregister_device"){
+ driver_name = kernel_string($driver->driver_name)
+ name = kernel_string($driver->name)
+ module = kernel_string($driver->owner->name)
+ index = $index
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.poll - Called when a tty device is being polled
+ * @file_name: the tty file name
+ * @wait_key: the wait queue key
+ */
+probe tty.poll = kernel.function("tty_poll"){
+ file_name = d_name($filp->f_path->dentry)
+
+ if ($wait)
+ wait_key = $wait->key
+ else
+ wait_key = 0
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.receive - called when a tty receives a message
+ * @cp: the buffer that was received
+ * @fp: The flag buffer
+ * @count: The amount of characters received
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @name: the name of the module file
+ * @index: The tty Index
+ * @id: the tty id
+ */
+probe tty.receive = kernel.function("n_tty_receive_buf"){
+ cp = kernel_string($cp)
+ fp = kernel_string($fp)
+ count = $count
+
+ driver_name = kernel_string($tty->driver->driver_name)
+ name = kernel_string($tty->driver->name)
+ index = $tty->index
+ id = $tty->magic
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.write - write to the tty line
+ * @buffer: the buffer that will be written
+ * @nr: The amount of characters
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @file_name: the file name lreated to the tty
+ */
+probe tty.write = kernel.function("n_tty_write"){
+ buffer = kernel_string($buf)
+ nr = $nr
+
+ file_name = d_name($file->f_path->dentry)
+ driver_name = kernel_string($tty->driver->driver_name)
+}
+
+/**
+ * probe tty.read - called when a tty line will be read
+ * @buffer: the buffer that will receive the characters
+ * @nr: The amount of characters to be read
+ * @driver_name: the driver name
+ * @file_name: the file name lreated to the tty
+ */
+probe tty.read = kernel.function("n_tty_read"){
+ buffer = kernel_string($buf)
+ nr = $nr
+ file_name = d_name($file->f_path->dentry)
+ driver_name = kernel_string($tty->driver->driver_name)
+}
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] A new testcase for tty tapset leitao
@ 2009-10-20 18:10 ` leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation leitao
2009-10-20 21:07 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example David Smith
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: leitao @ 2009-10-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
This patch just adds some probe examples to ttyspy.stp example.
---
testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp b/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
index 272d82e..1830509 100755
--- a/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
+++ b/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
@@ -44,3 +44,18 @@ probe timer.s(3) {
}
}
+probe tty.receive_buf {
+ printf("Buffer %s received by driver %s\n", cp, fp, name)
+}
+
+probe tty.put_char {
+ printf("Char %d sent by driver %s\n", cp, name)
+}
+
+probe tty.write {
+ printf("buffer %s wrote on %s\n", buffer, file_name)
+}
+
+probe tty.read {
+ printf("buffer %s read from %s\n", buffer, file_name)
+}
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] A new testcase for tty tapset
2009-10-20 18:10 [PATCH] A new tapset that adds support for tty and serial devices leitao
@ 2009-10-20 18:10 ` leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example leitao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: leitao @ 2009-10-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
This is a basic test to assure that the tty tapset is working
compiling and working properly
---
testsuite/buildok/tty.stp | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 testsuite/buildok/tty.stp
diff --git a/testsuite/buildok/tty.stp b/testsuite/buildok/tty.stp
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..0b5018d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/buildok/tty.stp
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+#! stap -wp4
+
+probe tty.poll{
+ printf("Pooling tty %s for wait queue key %d\n", file_name, wait_key);
+}
+
+probe tty.register {
+ printf("Device registered using index %d using driver %s(%s/%s)\n", index, driver_name, name, module)
+}
+
+probe tty.unregister {
+ printf("Device registered using index %d using driver %s(%s/%s)\n", index, driver_name, name, module)
+}
+
+probe tty.release {
+ printf("Closing file %s\n", file_name)
+ printf("INODE: number %d\nState: %d\nFlag: %d\n", inode_number, inode_state, inode_flags)
+ printf("File: %s (mode %x flags %x)\n", file_name, file_mode, file_flags)
+}
+
+probe tty.open {
+ printf("Opening tty file %s\n", file_name)
+ printf("INODE: number %d\nState: %d\nFlag: %d\n", inode_number, inode_state, inode_flags)
+ printf("File: %s mode %x flags %x\n", file_name, file_mode, file_flags)
+}
+
+probe tty.resize {
+ printf("Resizing %s from %dx%d (%d/%d) to %dx%d (%d/%d)\n", name, old_row, old_col, old_xpixel, old_ypixel,
+ new_row, new_col, new_xpixel, new_ypixel)
+}
+
+probe tty.ioctl {
+ printf("Ioctling file %s with %d %d\n", name, cmd, arg)
+}
+
+probe tty.init {
+ printf("new tty with name %s from driver %s and module %s\nn", driver_name, name, module)
+}
+
+probe tty.receive {
+ printf("Driver %s/%s (%d/%d) received %s (%s) with len %d\n", name, driver_name, index, id, cp, fp, count)
+}
+
+
+probe tty.write {
+ printf("Buffer %s (len %d) wrote on file %s (driver %s)\n", buffer, nr, file_name, driver_name)
+}
+
+probe tty.read {
+ printf("Reading tty file %s (driver %s) to a buffer with size %d containing %s\n", file_name, driver_name, nr, buffer)
+}
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example leitao
@ 2009-10-20 18:10 ` leitao
2009-10-20 21:23 ` Josh Stone
2009-10-20 21:07 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example David Smith
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: leitao @ 2009-10-20 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
Adding the TTY tapset to the .tmpl Reference documentation
---
doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl b/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
index 705cd3b..909dcfb 100644
--- a/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
+++ b/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
@@ -164,6 +164,15 @@
!Itapset/scsi.stp
</chapter>
+ <chapter id="tty.stp">
+ <title>TTY Tapset</title>
+ <para>
+ This family of probe points is used to probe TTY (Teletype) activities.
+ It contains the following probe points:
+ </para>
+!Itapset/scsi.stp
+ </chapter>
+
<chapter id="networking.stp">
<title>Networking Tapset</title>
<para>
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation leitao
@ 2009-10-20 21:07 ` David Smith
2009-10-21 13:34 ` Breno Leitao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Smith @ 2009-10-20 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: leitao; +Cc: systemtap
In general, the tapset and testcase look fine. There are two questions
I have that I've asked about below.
But, I'm not sure these changes improves the ttyspy.stp example. I've
never actually run it, but I believe your changes will display data that
the existing probes have already printed (and disrupt the output
formatting).
On 10/20/2009 01:08 PM, leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> This patch just adds some probe examples to ttyspy.stp example.
> ---
> testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp b/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
> index 272d82e..1830509 100755
> --- a/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
> +++ b/testsuite/systemtap.examples/io/ttyspy.stp
> @@ -44,3 +44,18 @@ probe timer.s(3) {
> }
> }
>
> +probe tty.receive_buf {
> + printf("Buffer %s received by driver %s\n", cp, fp, name)
> +}
Shouldn't this be 'tty.receive', not 'tty.receive_buf'?
> +
> +probe tty.put_char {
> + printf("Char %d sent by driver %s\n", cp, name)
> +}
I don't see a 'tty.put_char' probe in the tapset. Was this supposed to
be something else?
> +probe tty.write {
> + printf("buffer %s wrote on %s\n", buffer, file_name)
> +}
> +
> +probe tty.read {
> + printf("buffer %s read from %s\n", buffer, file_name)
> +}
--
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation leitao
@ 2009-10-20 21:23 ` Josh Stone
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Josh Stone @ 2009-10-20 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: leitao; +Cc: systemtap
On 10/20/2009 11:08 AM, leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> Adding the TTY tapset to the .tmpl Reference documentation
> ---
> doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl b/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
> index 705cd3b..909dcfb 100644
> --- a/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
> +++ b/doc/SystemTap_Tapset_Reference/tapsets.tmpl
> @@ -164,6 +164,15 @@
> !Itapset/scsi.stp
> </chapter>
>
> + <chapter id="tty.stp">
> + <title>TTY Tapset</title>
> + <para>
> + This family of probe points is used to probe TTY (Teletype) activities.
> + It contains the following probe points:
> + </para>
> +!Itapset/scsi.stp
> + </chapter>
> +
Note the copy/paste error on !I...
Please double-check that the docs are generated correctly. For example,
both tty.open and tty.release* have an extra space:
> + * @inode _flags: the inode flags
Thanks,
Josh
* Perhaps this should be called tty.close? I realize that the functions
you're probing have these imbalanced names, but that doesn't mean we
have to follow suit in the tapset.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example
2009-10-20 21:07 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example David Smith
@ 2009-10-21 13:34 ` Breno Leitao
2009-10-21 13:46 ` David Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2009-10-21 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Smith; +Cc: systemtap
David Smith wrote:
> In general, the tapset and testcase look fine. There are two questions
> I have that I've asked about below.
>
> But, I'm not sure these changes improves the ttyspy.stp example. I've
> never actually run it, but I believe your changes will display data that
> the existing probes have already printed (and disrupt the output
> formatting).
Yes. That is true. What is your suggestion here ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example
2009-10-21 13:34 ` Breno Leitao
@ 2009-10-21 13:46 ` David Smith
2009-10-21 14:03 ` Breno Leitao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Smith @ 2009-10-21 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Breno Leitao; +Cc: systemtap
On 10/21/2009 08:31 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> David Smith wrote:
>> In general, the tapset and testcase look fine. There are two questions
>> I have that I've asked about below.
>>
>> But, I'm not sure these changes improves the ttyspy.stp example. I've
>> never actually run it, but I believe your changes will display data that
>> the existing probes have already printed (and disrupt the output
>> formatting).
>
> Yes. That is true. What is your suggestion here ?
I guess I wouldn't change ttyspy.stp. If you'd like, create your own
example script that shows off the tty tapset.
--
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example
2009-10-21 13:46 ` David Smith
@ 2009-10-21 14:03 ` Breno Leitao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2009-10-21 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Smith; +Cc: systemtap
David Smith wrote:
> On 10/21/2009 08:31 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> David Smith wrote:
>>> In general, the tapset and testcase look fine. There are two questions
>>> I have that I've asked about below.
>>>
>>> But, I'm not sure these changes improves the ttyspy.stp example. I've
>>> never actually run it, but I believe your changes will display data that
>>> the existing probes have already printed (and disrupt the output
>>> formatting).
>> Yes. That is true. What is your suggestion here ?
>
> I guess I wouldn't change ttyspy.stp. If you'd like, create your own
> example script that shows off the tty tapset.
Ok. I just changed ttyspy.stp because Frank has asked me to put
there my "new" receive and write probes.
So, with those other fixes and without touching the ttyspy.stp, can I
push my patches ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-21 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-20 18:10 [PATCH] A new tapset that adds support for tty and serial devices leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] A new testcase for tty tapset leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example leitao
2009-10-20 18:10 ` [PATCH] tty: Adding tty.stp to the documentation leitao
2009-10-20 21:23 ` Josh Stone
2009-10-20 21:07 ` [PATCH] tty: improving the ttyspy example David Smith
2009-10-21 13:34 ` Breno Leitao
2009-10-21 13:46 ` David Smith
2009-10-21 14:03 ` Breno Leitao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).