From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14953 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2012 01:49:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14821 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2012 01:49:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx4-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:49:21 +0000 Received: from zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.15]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9U1nHND023288; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:49:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:49:00 -0000 From: Jon VanAlten To: Andrew Hughes Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net, Lukas Berk , Mark Wielaard Message-ID: <1299938704.3549181.1351561757214.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <561523661.6232111.1351170539693.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 > > > > > > I've updated the patch slightly to reflect a correction in > > > psScavenge.cpp that was causing a build error when icedtea-debug > > > wasn't > > > specified. The rest of the patch is unchanged from before. > > > > > > > And I've now pushed this. I know it's preferred that new work > > goes to forest in general, but this was discussed earlier when > > patch was originally posted, and afaict the feeling was it > > would be better to move all systemtap related patches there in > > one step some time later[1]. > > > > Thanks Lukas for this contribution! > > > > Why has this been pushed? We don't want more patches adding to > IcedTea7. > Please revert. > I'm sorry for the mix-up. Andrew and I discussed this further offline (sorry, this did not happen in public, but neither was it intentionally private). We reached the conclusion (I believe) that it would be best to wait and hear from Mark about plans referred to in email archive link below. Mark, do you have any comment here? Would it be for the best to revert here and apply instead to 7 forest? Also, I've backported this changeset to icedtea6, and it should also probably go somehow to 8. Can someone refresh me, as a rather seldom-contributor here, what the correct repos are for these? Thanks! jon > > [1] > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2012-August/020066.html > > > > -- > Andrew :) > > Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) > Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 > >