From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4716 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 12:12:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 4694 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 12:12:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:12:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA4CCNrF024225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:12:24 -0400 Received: from springer.wildebeest.org (ovpn-116-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.46]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA4CCMIW030987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:12:23 -0400 Received: by springer.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 73F514465A; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:12:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add syscall information for ARM From: Mark Wielaard To: Wade Farnsworth Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4EB2D9AC.7050409@mentor.com> References: <4EB2D832.60402@mentor.com> <4EB2D88B.8020301@mentor.com> <4EB2D9AC.7050409@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1320408742.15468.20.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:13 -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote: > Add syscall information for ARM devices. This allows tapsets to be > compiled on this architecture when CONFIG_UTRACE is enabled. I applied this because it looks sane. But I currently don't have a setup where I can test it myself. Thanks, Mark