From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12748 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2011 09:28:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12737 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2011 09:28:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:27:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAH9Rgdf005413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:27:42 -0500 Received: from springer.wildebeest.org (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAH9RfZq021620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:27:42 -0500 Received: by springer.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id CF6AB409C3; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:27:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Initial stap support for inode-based uprobes From: Mark Wielaard To: David Smith Cc: Josh Stone , systemtap@sourceware.org, Srikar Dronamraju In-Reply-To: <4EC3F556.4010902@redhat.com> References: <4DD5DEAA.3050908@redhat.com> <4EC3F556.4010902@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1321522060.3442.6.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 11:39 -0600, David Smith wrote: > I just got through running the systemtap testsuite on 2 different > configurations: >=20 > 1) stock f16 kernel and HEAD systemtap >=20 > # of expected passes 3096 > # of unexpected failures 63 > # of unexpected successes 8 > # of expected failures 259 > # of untested testcases 61 > # of unsupported tests 4 63 FAILs seems a bit high. For comparison these are my results on the same setup (assuming x86_64, but i686 on f15 is similar, and even on x86_64/rhel5 I don't get more than 30 FAILs - admittedly I did clean up the testsuite in the last week, so if your run is from a couple of days ago then you might want to rerun): Host: Linux toonder.wildebeest.org 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 11 21:47:56 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Snapshot: version 1.7/0.152 commit release-1.6-419-g0f7b51d GCC: 4.6.2 [gcc (GCC) 4.6.2 20111027 (Red Hat 4.6.2-1)] Distro: Fedora release 16 (Verne) # of expected passes 3142 # of unexpected failures 20 # of unexpected successes 8 # of expected failures 259 # of untested testcases 62 # of unsupported tests 2 Do you know where those extra 40 FAILs come from? Below is my FAIL list. 13 come from the nd_syscall testcase, which probably should be marked KFAIL (or is that XFAIL). Cheers, Mark FAIL: cast-scope FAIL: buildok/nfs_proc-detailed.stp FAIL: buildok/nfsd-all-probes.stp FAIL: buildok/nfsd-detailed.stp FAIL: buildok/rpc-detailed.stp FAIL: buildok/vfs-detailed.stp FAIL: semok/thirtynine.stp FAIL: 64-bit dup nd_syscall FAIL: 64-bit eventfd nd_syscall FAIL: 64-bit inotify nd_syscall FAIL: 64-bit pipe nd_syscall FAIL: 64-bit poll nd_syscall FAIL: 64-bit signalfd nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit dup nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit eventfd nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit inotify nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit net1 nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit pipe nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit poll nd_syscall FAIL: 32-bit signalfd nd_syscall