From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
To: prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>, dsmith@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Failures with exelib.exp testcase (was Re: minutes 2010-08-19)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1898521794.32834.1295479440812.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110119120045.GA2431@in.ibm.com>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:13PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:04 +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > > selected function print_hw
> > > prologue searching function 'print_hw'
> > > 0x10000530-0x10000570@/home/prasadkr/helloworld.c:4
> > > checking line record 0x10000530@/home/prasadkr/helloworld.c:5
> > > prologue found function 'print_hw' (naked) = 0x10000530
> > > probe print_hw@/home/prasadkr/helloworld.c:4
> > > process=/home/prasadkr/helloworld reloc=.absolute pc=0x10000530
> >
> > So, we actually are putting the probe at address 0x10000530, and
> > uaddr()
> > does return that address from within the probe context. Good. But
> > our
> > translation table doesn't contain "print_hw" at that address.
> >
> > Could you check some things?
> > - Can you run it under gdb and put a breakpoint at print_hw,
> > which address does that give?
> > - What is the output of eu-readelf -s helloworld?
>
> # gdb helloworld
> GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2
> Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show
> copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu".
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> Reading symbols from /home/prasadkr/helloworld...done.
> (gdb) break print_hw
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x10000544: file helloworld.c, line 6.
> (gdb) q
We place our probe at 0x10000530, while GDB select address
0x10000544. Maybe that difference is just the prologue or something.
Could you check by doing an disassemble of print_hw:
(gdb) disassemble print_hw
> I'm attaching the output of eu-readelf to this mail.
> Symbol table [37] '.symtab' contains 75 entries:
> 56 local symbols String table: [38] '.strtab'
> Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
> [...]
> 61: 0000000010010a70 64 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 22 print_hw
So, that does match our _stp_symbol entry:
{ 0x10010a70, "print_hw" },
and is also totally not what we want/need to resolve the address to
the symbol name. I am not sure what is going on here.
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100826194353.GC3185@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20100827092840.GA4129@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20100830032810.GA5213@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1283152139.2362.2.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org>
[not found] ` <20100830111805.GA4115@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1283169285.15128.20.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>
[not found] ` <20101111121023.GA2597@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1289485749.2470.5.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org>
[not found] ` <20110117145437.GA4251@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1295278356.2998.47.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>
2011-01-18 13:09 ` K.Prasad
2011-01-18 13:30 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-01-18 14:35 ` K.Prasad
2011-01-18 14:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-01-19 12:01 ` K.Prasad
2011-01-19 23:24 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2011-01-20 1:19 ` Roland McGrath
2011-01-20 11:11 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-01-20 18:53 ` Roland McGrath
2011-01-21 23:16 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-02 12:24 ` K.Prasad
2011-02-02 12:59 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-03 5:04 ` K.Prasad
2011-02-03 10:16 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-03 12:34 ` K.Prasad
2011-02-03 12:44 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-03 18:59 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-08 13:13 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-08 18:45 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-08 19:51 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-08 19:57 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-14 16:50 ` K.Prasad
2011-02-14 20:33 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-03-04 7:13 ` K.Prasad
2011-03-04 15:06 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-03-17 9:05 ` K.Prasad
2011-03-17 13:04 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1898521794.32834.1295479440812.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=scox@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).