* probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
@ 2005-09-26 19:58 William Cohen
2005-09-26 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Cohen @ 2005-09-26 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SystemTAP
Is there a bugzilla entry to track the problem with attempting to probe
functions in kernel modules? I recalled this being mentioned as being a
problem due to the debuginfo generation, but I looked through the
bugzilla entries on sources.redhat.com/systemtap and didn't see any
entry for the problem.
When talking to one of the Red Hat support engineers who is starting to
use SystemTap, this came up. It would be nice to be able to point him at
something so he know when this has been resolved.
-Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
2005-09-26 19:58 probe kernel.module bugzilla entry William Cohen
@ 2005-09-26 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2005-09-26 20:19 ` Roland McGrath
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2005-09-26 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 318 bytes --]
Hi -
wcohen wrote:
> Is there a bugzilla entry to track the problem with attempting to
> probe functions in kernel modules? [...]
Yes. Unfortunately it's not a systemtap bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165416
and maybe:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165528
- FChE
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
2005-09-26 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2005-09-26 20:19 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-26 20:25 ` William Cohen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2005-09-26 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: systemtap
The botched .ko.debug problem is fixed in rawhide, and has never struck any
released RHEL4 binaries in fact. The build environment issue is fixed in
FC4 as well (FC4 update redhat-rpm-config-8.0.34-1.1), and FC4 update
kernels built since that update should be fine. I think that is
kernel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 and later.
Thanks,
Roland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
2005-09-26 20:19 ` Roland McGrath
@ 2005-09-26 20:25 ` William Cohen
2005-09-26 20:28 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-26 20:57 ` Roland McGrath
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Cohen @ 2005-09-26 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland McGrath; +Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler, systemtap
Roland McGrath wrote:
> The botched .ko.debug problem is fixed in rawhide, and has never struck any
> released RHEL4 binaries in fact. The build environment issue is fixed in
> FC4 as well (FC4 update redhat-rpm-config-8.0.34-1.1), and FC4 update
> kernels built since that update should be fine. I think that is
> kernel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4 and later.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
I ran into this problem on a newer FC4 kernel, 2.6.12-1.1456_FC4smp
obtained via yum. Could things still be wrong in red hat's build system
for FC4?
-Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
2005-09-26 20:25 ` William Cohen
@ 2005-09-26 20:28 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-26 20:57 ` Roland McGrath
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2005-09-26 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Cohen; +Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler, systemtap
> I ran into this problem on a newer FC4 kernel, 2.6.12-1.1456_FC4smp
> obtained via yum. Could things still be wrong in red hat's build system
> for FC4?
I sure hope not! I'll look at that kernel build.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: probe kernel.module bugzilla entry
2005-09-26 20:25 ` William Cohen
2005-09-26 20:28 ` Roland McGrath
@ 2005-09-26 20:57 ` Roland McGrath
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2005-09-26 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Cohen; +Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler, systemtap
> I ran into this problem on a newer FC4 kernel, 2.6.12-1.1456_FC4smp
This rpm does not have the problems that Frank referred to.
If you are having problems, describe them here or file a fresh bug.
Thanks,
Roland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-26 20:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-26 19:58 probe kernel.module bugzilla entry William Cohen
2005-09-26 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2005-09-26 20:19 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-26 20:25 ` William Cohen
2005-09-26 20:28 ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-26 20:57 ` Roland McGrath
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).