From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30736 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2005 15:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 30730 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2005 15:49:51 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:49:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBCFnmOh009308 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:49:48 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBCFnl129385; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:49:47 -0500 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBCFnlN8027299; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:49:47 -0500 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBCFnlGO003002; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:49:47 -0500 Received: (from fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBCFnlkx003001; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:49:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:49:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: William Cohen Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: prompt script exiting Message-ID: <20051212154947.GM20633@redhat.com> References: <9FBCE015AF479F46B3B410499F3AE05B08981C@pdsmsx405> <439D9A5C.1020705@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <439D9A5C.1020705@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 Hi - wcohen wrote: > That [systemtap_session change] sounds like it would operate in the > manner that people would expect. [...] Yeah. Would you mind testing it and committing it if it works? > What happens if there are two scripts running? Is this flag local to > the script or a global? [...] "global" in the systemtap sense means shared amongst probe handlers of the same systemtap session. There is no "global" data in the sense of kernel-wide at all, except perhaps in kprobes internals. - FChE