public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug kprobes/2071] Probes on ISR with probes on task thread's prehandler crash the system
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060113020832.19396.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051220073112.2071.anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>


------- Additional Comments From anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com  2006-01-13 02:08 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> On ppc64, I tried to disable the interrupt in the kprobe handler in the case 
of
> reentry and re-enable interrupt when it came out of the handler and it seems 
to
> *WORK*. I was able to complete my kernel build (make -j8), where it gave an 
oops
> before. 
Hien, I tried your patch (porting onto IA64) and it did not work for me. Also 
I see the solution you have mentioned might now work for x86_64 too. 
Especially on x86_64 even when you disable interrupt, NMI's can still happen 
and any probes on that path will cause the problem again.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2071

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-13  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-20  7:34 [Bug kprobes/2071] New: " anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2005-12-20  9:40 ` [Bug kprobes/2071] " anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2005-12-21 18:17 ` hien at us dot ibm dot com
2005-12-22  2:26 ` hien at us dot ibm dot com
2005-12-27  3:41 ` bibo dot mao at intel dot com
2005-12-28  6:13 ` bibo dot mao at intel dot com
2005-12-30  9:44 ` bibo dot mao at intel dot com
2006-01-13  2:08 ` anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com [this message]
2006-01-13  2:14 ` anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2006-01-13  2:15 ` anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2006-01-13  4:42 ` bibo dot mao at intel dot com
2006-01-13 17:37 ` hien at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-13 19:23 ` anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2006-01-13 23:00 ` hien at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-14  0:55 ` hien at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-16 21:14 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2006-12-11 19:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-06-11 12:07 ` srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2007-06-11 16:14 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-06-11 16:43 ` anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com
2008-01-17 14:54 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-01-17 21:56 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-01-17 21:57 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-01-17 21:58 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-01-18  3:30 ` shaohua dot li at intel dot com
2008-01-21 22:47 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-03-13 15:00 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060113020832.19396.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).