From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26211 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 10:55:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 26148 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2006 10:54:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060217105459.26147.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hiramatu at sdl dot hitachi dot co dot jp" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060209035522.2307.fche@redhat.com> References: <20060209035522.2307.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/2307] binary tracing X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From hiramatu at sdl dot hitachi dot co dot jp 2006-02-17 10:54 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The following are my thoughts about binary trace interface. In a summary, I > prefer Martin Hunt's ideas. Basically, I agree with his ideas too. I suggest introducing the compressed format when the arguments of the same type continue. For example: printb("%d%d%d%d", long1, long2, long3, long4); This expression will be compressed as below; printb("%d4", long1, long2, long3, long4); This compressed format is simple and reduces transporting data size. By the way, I also hope the name of the interface is more neutral as printf ;-). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2307 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.