public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug translator/2307] binary tracing
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060217153245.31543.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060209035522.2307.fche@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com  2006-02-17 15:32 -------
> printb("%d4", long1, long2, long3, long4);
> 
> This compressed format is simple and reduces transporting data size.
> 
In fact, this is almost the same as what I did in
LKET(log_tracedata_common_compact & log_tracedata_common_compact_more in
logtrace.stp). It should be useful for someone, although not much useful for
LKET maybe.

> By the way, I also hope the name of the interface is more neutral as printf ;-).

How about _stp_bin_printf/bin_vsnprintf corresponding to current
_stp_printf/vsnprintf? Any good suggestions about their names?

_lket_printf is intended for LKET only. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2307

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-17 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-09  3:55 [Bug translator/2307] New: " fche at redhat dot com
2006-02-17  6:53 ` [Bug translator/2307] " guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com
2006-02-17 10:55 ` hiramatu at sdl dot hitachi dot co dot jp
2006-02-17 15:32 ` guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com [this message]
2006-02-19  5:01 ` jrs at us dot ibm dot com
2006-02-20  3:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
2006-02-21  8:43 ` hunt at redhat dot com
2006-02-21  8:43 ` hunt at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060217153245.31543.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).