From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31563 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 15:32:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 31544 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2006 15:32:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060217153245.31543.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060209035522.2307.fche@redhat.com> References: <20060209035522.2307.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/2307] binary tracing X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com 2006-02-17 15:32 ------- > printb("%d4", long1, long2, long3, long4); > > This compressed format is simple and reduces transporting data size. > In fact, this is almost the same as what I did in LKET(log_tracedata_common_compact & log_tracedata_common_compact_more in logtrace.stp). It should be useful for someone, although not much useful for LKET maybe. > By the way, I also hope the name of the interface is more neutral as printf ;-). How about _stp_bin_printf/bin_vsnprintf corresponding to current _stp_printf/vsnprintf? Any good suggestions about their names? _lket_printf is intended for LKET only. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2307 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.