From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28835 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2006 21:26:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28826 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2006 21:26:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fmr22.intel.com (HELO scsfmr002.sc.intel.com) (143.183.121.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:26:13 +0000 Received: from scsfmr101.sc.intel.com (scsfmr101.sc.intel.com [10.3.253.10]) by scsfmr002.sc.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id k27LQAxt018853; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:26:10 GMT Received: from unix-os.sc.intel.com (unix-os.sc.intel.com [172.25.110.7]) by scsfmr101.sc.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with ESMTP id k27LKbvK026020; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:20:37 GMT Received: (from askeshav@localhost) by unix-os.sc.intel.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id k27LQ9Z29999; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:26:09 -0800 Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:26:00 -0000 From: Keshavamurthy Anil S To: Prasanna S Panchamukhi Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [1/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for i386 Message-ID: <20060307132608.A29873@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Reply-To: Keshavamurthy Anil S References: <20060307133832.GA2245@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060307133832.GA2245@in.ibm.com>; from prasanna@in.ibm.com on Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:38:32AM -0800 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 10.3.253.10 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00729.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:38:32AM -0800, Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote: > > Hi, > > Below is the set of patches to fix broken fault handling > for i386, x86_64, ppc64, ia64 and sparc64 architectures > against 2.6.16-rc5-mm2. > > These patches are tested for i386 and x86_64 architectures. > Could you please test it for ia64 and ppc64. Prasanna, Can you share your test module code here, so that the same can be used(with minor tweak, if requred) for testing other architecture. Also in you testing, did you cover fault handling during pre/post/singlestep cases? Thanks, Anil