public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [1/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for i386
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060307133832.GA2245@in.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

Below is the set of patches to fix broken fault handling
for i386, x86_64, ppc64, ia64 and sparc64 architectures
against 2.6.16-rc5-mm2.

These patches are tested for i386 and x86_64 architectures.
Could you please test it for ia64 and ppc64.

Thanks
Prasanna


This patch provides proper kprobes fault handling, if a user-specified
pre/post handlers tries to access user address space, through
copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. The user-specified fault handler
gets called only if the fault occurs while executing user-specified
handlers. In such a case user-specified handler is allowed to fix it
first, later if the user-specifed fault handler does not fix it, we
try to fix it by calling fix_exception(). The user-specified handler
will not be called if the fault happens when single stepping the
original instruction, instead we reset the current probe and allow the
system page fault handler to fix it up.

Signed-off-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>


 arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-i386-pagefault-handling arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c~kprobes-i386-pagefault-handling	2006-03-07 11:18:14.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-prasanna/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c	2006-03-07 11:18:14.000000000 +0530
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/kdebug.h>
 #include <asm/desc.h>
+#include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 void jprobe_return_end(void);
 
@@ -545,15 +546,57 @@ static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(s
 	struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
 	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
 
-	if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, trapnr))
-		return 1;
-
-	if (kcb->kprobe_status & KPROBE_HIT_SS) {
-		resume_execution(cur, regs, kcb);
+	switch(kcb->kprobe_status) {
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
+	case KPROBE_REENTER:
+		/*
+		 * We are here because the instruction being single
+		 * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
+		 * kprobe and the eip points back to the probe address
+		 * and allow the page fault handler to continue as a
+		 * normal page fault.
+		 */
+		regs->eip = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
 		regs->eflags |= kcb->kprobe_old_eflags;
-
-		reset_current_kprobe();
+		if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
+			restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
+		else
+			reset_current_kprobe();
 		preempt_enable_no_resched();
+		break;
+	case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
+	case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
+		/*
+		 * We increment the nmissed count for accounting,
+		 * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accouting
+		 * these specific fault cases.
+		 */
+		kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(cur);
+
+		/*
+		 * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
+		 * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
+		 * if handler tries to access user space by
+		 * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
+		 * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
+		 */
+		if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, trapnr))
+			return 1;
+
+		/*
+		 * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
+		 * zero, try to fix up.
+		 */
+		if (fixup_exception(regs))
+			return 1;
+
+		/*
+		 * fixup_exception() could not handle it,
+		 * Let do_page_fault() fix it.
+		 */
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }

_
-- 
Prasanna S Panchamukhi
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Email: prasanna@in.ibm.com
Ph: 91-80-51776329

             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-07 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-07 13:37 Prasanna S Panchamukhi [this message]
2006-03-07 13:40 ` [2/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for x86_64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2006-03-07 13:39   ` [3/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for ppc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2006-03-07 13:40     ` [4/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for ia64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2006-03-07 13:41       ` [5/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for sparc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2006-03-08  8:13       ` [4/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for ia64 bibo,mao
2006-03-08 11:17         ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2006-03-07 21:26 ` [1/5 PATCH] Kprobes fix for broken fault handling for i386 Keshavamurthy Anil S
2006-03-07 22:24   ` Hien Nguyen
2006-03-08  5:13     ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060307133832.GA2245@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).