From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-2899-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13146 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2006 09:39:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 13119 invoked by uid 48); 30 Mar 2006 09:39:53 -0000
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:39:00 -0000
From: "guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060330093952.2497.guanglei@cn.ibm.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug runtime/2497] New: STP_STRING_SIZE set by stap is too small
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2

Hi,
 If you use:
   log(backtrace( )) 
 in your codes, you will find that in many cases the result string will be
truncated.
   
  I found it is due to the following codes generated by translator:
   ...
   #ifndef MAXSTRINGLEN
   #define MAXSTRINGLEN 128
   ...
   #define STP_STRING_SIZE MAXSTRINGLEN

  so STP_STRING_SIZE is set to 128, and this is obviously too small for some
underlying transport functions.

-- 
           Summary: STP_STRING_SIZE set by stap is too small
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2497

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.