From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26326 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2006 19:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 26319 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2006 19:16:16 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:16:14 +0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11423357B; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by magilla.sf.frob.com (Postfix, from userid 5281) id A42B61809CE; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:16:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch for module function probe In-Reply-To: Frank Ch. Eigler's message of , 3 April 2006 12:14:32 -0400 X-Windows: a mistake carried out to perfection. Message-Id: <20060403191611.A42B61809CE@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:16:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > Yes, it might be. It would be best if there was a way of automagically > supporting module("foo") for a foo that's compiled into vmlinux with a > CONFIG_FOO=y instead of CONFIG_FOO=m. Does kbuild leave any traces of > the module ancestry in object files produced this way? I don't think there is any way to recover that information.