From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26976 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2006 04:30:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26922 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2006 04:30:43 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060410043043.26919.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "prasanna at in dot ibm dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060323004500.2476.jkenisto@us.ibm.com> References: <20060323004500.2476.jkenisto@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug kprobes/2476] Switch Kprobes inline functions to __kprobes? X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q2/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From prasanna at in dot ibm dot com 2006-04-10 04:30 ------- Subject: Re: Switch Kprobes inline functions to __kprobes? On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:24:09AM -0000, bibo dot mao at intel dot com wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From bibo dot mao at intel dot com 2006-04-10 03:24 ------- > This patch works my IA64 box, but I have one question, almost all function in > arch/i386/kernel/kprobe.c is prefixed with __kprobes. currently I think that > the whole kernel path for KPROBE_REENTER routine should not be probed, and I do > know whether there are other cases which should not be probed also. True, apart from KPROBE_REENTER, probes on routines from interrupt handler to the kprobes_handler() can cause recursion. Thanks Prasanna -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2476 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.