[Bug translator/2422] module("*") probes fail with debug-info-less modules

["guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

------- Additional Comments From guanglei at cn dot ibm dot com  2006-07-31 14:32 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> What happens if we just switch to get_module_dwarf(false) altogether?  (Testing
> for equality with "*" would be insufficient - we have wildcards like "*foo*".)

Simply calling get_module_dwarf(false) seems enough. Here is a patch:

RCS file: /cvs/systemtap/src/tapsets.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.137
diff -r1.137 tapsets.cxx
558c558
<   void get_module_dwarf(bool required = true)
---
>   void get_module_dwarf(bool required = false)
585c585
<     get_module_dwarf(true);
---
>     get_module_dwarf(false);

This patch will:

if MPATTERN contains wildcard(*,?,[])
{
    foreach module in MPATTERN
    {
        if this module has no debuginfo
            give a warning and continue
    }
    if all modules have no debuginfo
       && this probe point is not optional
    {
        give an error and stop
    }  else
        give a warning and continue
}  else  {
    if this module has no debuginfo 
      && this probe point is not optional
        give an error and stop
    else
        give a warning and continue
}

I tried different combinations and it passed tests:

probe module("*ath*").function("*dispatch*"), kernel.function("sys_getsid")
probe module("*ath*").function("*dispatch*") ?, kernel.function("sys_getsid")
probe module("ath_[abcp]ci").function("*dispatch*"), kernel.function("sys_getsid")
probe module("ath_[abcp]ci").function("*dispatch*")?, kernel.function("sys_getsid")
probe module("ath_[abcp]ci").statement("0xf89aae29")
probe module("ath_[abcp]ci").statement("0xf89aae29")?
...

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2422

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.