From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2007 20:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17124 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2007 20:06:04 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.osdl.org (HELO smtp.osdl.org) (65.172.181.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:05:59 +0000 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l0RK5E1m018268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:05:14 -0800 Received: from box (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with SMTP id l0RK5CRf015749; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:05:12 -0800 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:06:00 -0000 From: Andrew Morton To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Ingo@maccavity.nachtwache.org, Christoph@maccavity.nachtwache.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Martin J. Bligh" , Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Molnar , ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , Douglas Niehaus Subject: Re: [Ltt-dev] [PATCH 00/09] atomic.h : standardizing atomic primitives Message-Id: <20070127120512.04a98fcd.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20070127181116.GA5158@Krystal> References: <11697417541743-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> <20070127021834.e26e955d.akpm@osdl.org> <20070127181116.GA5158@Krystal> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.111__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.172 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > I am currently trying crosstool by Dan Kegel, it looks promising. > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ Yeah, I spent a frustrating two days with crosstool, managed to eke a number of cross-compilers out of it, but it took a *lot* of experimentation with gcc, glibc and binutils versions to get combinations which actually work. Good luck ;) There used to be someone who had a full suite, and who regularly published cross-compile results, but he stopped 6-12 months ago and I forget who that clever person was?