[Bug translator/4295] New: "stap -m" enhancement

[Bug translator/4295] New: "stap -m" enhancement

[dsmith at redhat dot com]

This enhancement has been split off from bug #4281

When running "stap -m close close.stp", where's close.ko?  I shouldn't need to
also use -k.

Perhaps when using '-m NAME', the resulting module (if any) should be copied to
the current directory.

For more discussion, see original bug.

-- 
           Summary: "stap -m" enhancement
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: dsmith at redhat dot com
                CC: hunt at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4295

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug translator/4295] "stap -m" enhancement

[wcohen at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat dot com  2007-07-26 18:17 -------
Created an attachment (id=1933)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1933&action=view)
Store resulting module in current directory

This patch is an attempt to handle the common use case where someone wants to
generate an instrumentation module that will be used repeatedly with staprun.
The patch copies the resulting file into the current directory before removing
the temporary directory. The patch also limits the systemtap to pass pass 4
when the -m command is used. The instrumentaiton is not run at that momemt

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4295

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug translator/4295] "stap -m" enhancement

[dsmith at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From dsmith at redhat dot com  2007-07-26 20:29 -------
Changes similar to the patch attached to this bug have been checked in.  One
difference is that '-m MODNAME' does not imply '-p4'.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4295

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.