From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21945 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2007 20:01:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21733 invoked by uid 48); 6 Apr 2007 20:00:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070406200055.21732.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fche at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20070406004131.4326.dcnltc@us.ibm.com> References: <20070406004131.4326.dcnltc@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug documentation/4326] make all fails if '.' on execution path X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2007-04-06 21:00 ------- > Yes, . is at the beginning. OK. In this case, it does not seem appropriate to add documentation. That's because putting "." at the front of one's PATH has long been known as a grossly insecure configuration. Having a conflicting ld is the least of your problems. Consider % cat /naughty/place/ls #! /bin/sh rm -rf $HOME % cd /naughty/place % ls -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4326 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.