public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Vara Prasad <prasadav@us.ibm.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	        SystemTAP <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: results of x86_64, i686, and ia64 testing on 20070512 snapshot
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070517060201.GA24171@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464B5C69.5020607@us.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:32:57PM -0700, David Wilder wrote:
> Vara Prasad wrote:
> 
> >William Cohen wrote:
> >
> >>Here are the test results from latest snapshot. I have gone through 
> >>and placed PR number on things that I know. sorry I haven't gotten 
> >>all of them.
> >
> >
> >Hi Will,
> >
> >Thanks for a wonderful job of covering so many OS versions and so many 
> >platforms.
> >
> >You are running against 2.6.21 with fedora patches (if any) where as 
> >PPC tests seems to be running with 2.6.22-rc1 which is straight Linus 
> >kernel, I don't know what Dave is running on s390.  The only question 
> >I have is can we at least have one run on an x86 platform with Linus 
> >kernel so we have apples to apples comparison across all the major 
> >platforms.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Vara Prasad
> >
> I am currently running 2.6.21-rc6-git5.    It would be a good idea if we 
> all ran the same version (or close if possible) on all platforms.   I 
> suggest we just stick to the current stable Linus kernel.  But I am open 
> to suggestions.   The current stable version is  2.4.21.1

I think the agreement was to run the tests on the latest Linus' released
kernel. That'd make it 2.6.22-rc1 as of now.

Ananth

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-16  2:10 William Cohen
2007-05-16  2:27 ` Vara Prasad
2007-05-16 18:51   ` David Wilder
2007-05-16 19:20     ` William Cohen
2007-05-17  5:58     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2007-05-17 14:44   ` results of x86_64, i686, and ia64 testing on 20070512 on 2.6.22-rc1 kernel William Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070517060201.GA24171@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=prasadav@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).