From: "jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug uprobes/4738] UPROBES_SSOL and URETPROBES must depend on UPROBES in Kconfig
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711170219.4423.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070704064428.4738.ananth@in.ibm.com>
------- Additional Comments From jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2007-07-11 17:02 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > See "Advice from Dave Hansen" (from a code review) in Comment #3. Look at
> > arch/*/Kconfig, and you'll see lots of "config" options with no prompts [...]
>
> What I'm missing is why these should show up as CONFIG_ANYTHING at all.
> Why not just include uretprobes always,
Some people seem to think uretprobes is harder to grok and/or port than one
might suppose. So we provide for the possibility of a port that implements
uprobes but not uretprobes.
> and SSOL automagically as available
> on the platform?
We do. However, as part of the magic, the platform-dependent code must indicate
whether it supports SSOL. The interminable argument is about how to express that.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4738
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-04 6:44 [Bug uprobes/4738] New: " ananth at in dot ibm dot com
2007-07-07 0:16 ` [Bug uprobes/4738] " jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-07-09 4:16 ` ananth at in dot ibm dot com
2007-07-09 20:52 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-07-10 4:53 ` ananth at in dot ibm dot com
2007-07-10 21:01 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-07-10 21:11 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-07-10 22:21 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-07-11 0:42 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-07-11 4:19 ` ananth at in dot ibm dot com
2007-07-11 17:25 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com [this message]
2007-07-11 18:30 ` jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711170219.4423.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).