From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-6748-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14322 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2007 23:52:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 14301 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jul 2007 23:51:53 -0000
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:32:00 -0000
From: "jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20070719235153.4817.jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug lket/4817] New: Cannibalize and retire LKET tapset?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2

With the IBM China Labs guys no longer working for the LTC,
src/tapset/LKET/*.stp are suffering from neglect and resultant bit rot.  Several
outstanding bugs are associated with these files.  Many of the probepoints that
were provided only by LKET are now provided by other tapsets as well.  So
retiring LKET is looking like a definite possibility.

But before we do that, we need at least to identify the useful LKET-only
probepoints and functions, and make them available in other tapsets.

-- 
           Summary: Cannibalize and retire LKET tapset?
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: lket
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4817

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.