public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
@ 2007-09-20  3:08 jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
  2007-09-20  8:29 ` [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and " fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com @ 2007-09-20  3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

A user was having trouble getting stap to accept a statement"func@file:line")
probe.  The fix was to change the "file" component from an absolute pathname to
a pathname relative to the root of the kernel source tree.

Neither the stapprobes man page nor the Language Reference make it clear that
the pathname must be relative, although the examples in the Language Reference
show relative pathnames.

Am I correct in thinking that the pathname must be relative?  Does this need to
be clarified anywhere besides in the stapprobes man page and the Language Reference?

-- 
           Summary: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe
                    PATTERNs
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: documentation
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
  2007-09-20  3:08 [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2007-09-20  8:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2007-10-15 19:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2007-09-20  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2007-09-20 00:38 -------
> Am I correct in thinking that the pathname must be relative?

Not exactly.  The path name patterns need to match the path names as
seen by the compiler.  A Red Hat kernel build happens to use relative
names, but others may not.  We should try harder to support both, perhaps
with an implicit "**"-equivalent widget at the front of the path name
string.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Document relative vs.       |Support relative and
                   |absolute pathnames in probe |absolute pathnames in probe
                   |PATTERNs                    |PATTERNs


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
  2007-09-20  3:08 [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
  2007-09-20  8:29 ` [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and " fche at redhat dot com
@ 2007-10-15 19:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2008-08-11 17:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2008-08-11 19:23 ` fche at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2007-10-15 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2007-10-15 19:44 -------
*** Bug 4397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hunt at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
  2007-09-20  3:08 [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
  2007-09-20  8:29 ` [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and " fche at redhat dot com
  2007-10-15 19:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2008-08-11 17:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2008-08-11 19:23 ` fche at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-08-11 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2008-08-11 17:26 -------
Please check the effect of commit #2ed8949.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|hunt at redhat dot com      |
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
  2007-09-20  3:08 [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-08-11 17:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2008-08-11 19:23 ` fche at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-08-11 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|systemtap at sources dot    |fche at redhat dot com
                   |redhat dot com              |
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-11 19:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-20  3:08 [Bug documentation/5049] New: Document relative vs. absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2007-09-20  8:29 ` [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and " fche at redhat dot com
2007-10-15 19:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-08-11 17:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-08-11 19:23 ` fche at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).