* [Bug translator/2067] New: investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo
@ 2005-12-19 18:45 fche at redhat dot com
2005-12-19 22:05 ` [Bug translator/2067] " roland at gnu dot org
2007-10-15 19:46 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-12-19 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
According to one report, they don't currently work.
One possibility is to export the CONFIG_* values to systemtap scripts as yet
another preprocessor predicate, so that a cunning user could use kernel. instead
of module("foo"). (assuming that even works. A better way would be to make the
translator/elfutils understand module("foo") for both cases.
--
Summary: investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in
foo
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: translator
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2067
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/2067] investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo
2005-12-19 18:45 [Bug translator/2067] New: investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-12-19 22:05 ` roland at gnu dot org
2007-10-15 19:46 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: roland at gnu dot org @ 2005-12-19 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org 2005-12-19 21:02 -------
In the kernel build process, each module is drawn from a subdirectory in the
source tree. So one possibility is to define module-name matching to mean a
name wildcard on the CU name, which is the source file.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2067
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/2067] investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo
2005-12-19 18:45 [Bug translator/2067] New: investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo fche at redhat dot com
2005-12-19 22:05 ` [Bug translator/2067] " roland at gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-15 19:46 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2007-10-15 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2007-10-15 19:45 -------
explicit alternation is a good implementation tactic
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3887 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2067
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-15 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-19 18:45 [Bug translator/2067] New: investigate whether/how module("foo").* for compiled-in foo fche at redhat dot com
2005-12-19 22:05 ` [Bug translator/2067] " roland at gnu dot org
2007-10-15 19:46 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).