From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7890 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2007 19:21:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7800 invoked by uid 48); 5 Dec 2007 19:21:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071205192103.7798.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mhiramat at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20070817183537.4935.fche@redhat.com> References: <20070817183537.4935.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/4935] support on-the-fly probe enable/disable syntax X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com 2007-12-05 19:21 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > One question regarding the new semko/thirtynine test: why should that fail > rather than be interpreted as an unconditional probe that happens to contain > ".if(1)" as the last probe point component? Because the "if()" statement is not a component of a probe point, you should NOT use it with ".". The parser passes ".if(1)" as a probe point component.However, the elaborator fails to resolve it, so it is "semko". Here is the error output: --- semantic error: probe point mismatch at position 2 (alternatives: call inline return) while resolving probe point kernel.function("sys_open").if(1) --- Thanks, -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4935 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.