From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28514 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2008 11:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28039 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2008 11:16:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080109111634.28038.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080108215138.5555.mhiramat@redhat.com> References: <20080108215138.5555.mhiramat@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/5555] signal-all-probes.stp and proc_snoop.stp fail on ia64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com 2008-01-09 11:16 ------- Even I face the same problem in ppc64(But I was not aware of ia64 case). I have proposed the patch in bug#5151. ========================================= tapset/signal.stp | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: src/tapset/signal.stp =================================================================== --- src.orig/tapset/signal.stp +++ src/tapset/signal.stp @@ -385,7 +385,8 @@ probe signal.pending.return = kernel.fun * regs : Address in the Kernel Mode stack area * */ -probe signal.handle = kernel.function("handle_signal") +probe signal.handle = kernel.function("handle_signal") ? , + kernel.function("handle_signal32") ? { sig = $sig sig_name = _signal_name($sig) ================================================= Please find the equivalent function of handle_signal() in IA64 and add it here. Thanks Srinivasa DS -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5555 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.