public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hunt at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug runtime/5194] IO problem on begin/end probes; need
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080129170720.17995.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071018140048.5194.hunt@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From hunt at redhat dot com  2008-01-29 17:07 -------

> Unless you have a scenario that could explain cpu switching, or an
> actual test case that demonstrates it occurring, let's please close
> this bug.

Something could only happen now if code included using "-g" slept during a begin
or end probe.  The only reason to ever do so that I can think of is because we
decide to change IO to timeout and retry on error during end probes.  And the
reason to do that is because in extreme cases, on single-cpu systems, the total
data collected in arrays and being dumped in the end probe exceeds the free
space in the relayfs buffer.  So we have to free the cpu and let stapio read
from the relayfs buffer to continue.  Such a situation would be rare and we
could just say the proper fix is to simply use "-s" to set the buffer size larger.

I'm fine with that, at least for now. We have bigger fish to fry.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5194

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-29 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-18 14:01 [Bug runtime/5194] New: IO problem on begin/end probes hunt at redhat dot com
2007-10-18 14:10 ` [Bug runtime/5194] " fche at redhat dot com
2007-10-18 14:11 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-10-18 14:25 ` hunt at redhat dot com
2007-10-18 15:19 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-01-21 17:42 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-01-21 17:56 ` hunt at redhat dot com
2008-01-21 18:13 ` [Bug runtime/5194] IO problem on begin/end probes; need fche at redhat dot com
2008-01-21 18:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-01-29 16:40 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-01-29 17:08 ` hunt at redhat dot com [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080129170720.17995.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).