* [Bug runtime/6764] New: Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system
@ 2008-07-24 10:26 srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:34 ` [Bug runtime/6764] " srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:46 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com @ 2008-07-24 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
Environment: Kernel-2.6.26-rc9,elfutils-0.131,systemtap-0.7
Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390. I have narrowed down this
problem, it looks like probing scheduler_tick() along with printing value of
pp() or probefunc() hangs the system.
global funcname;
global funcname1;
probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
funcname = probefunc();
funcname1 = pp();
printf("========%s \n",funcname);
printf("========%s \n",funcname1);
}
probe begin {
printf(" loading \n");
}
probe end {
printf(" unloading \n");
}
However a simple script which probes scheduler_tick() and logs some message
works well on the same system.
probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
printf("hi \n");
}
probe begin {
printf(" loading \n");
}
probe end {
printf(" unloading \n");
}
Could somebody throw light on why printing pp() or probefunc() inside
scheduler_tick() causes system hang.
Thanks in advance
Srinivasa DS
--
Summary: Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390
system
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: runtime
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6764
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug runtime/6764] Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system
2008-07-24 10:26 [Bug runtime/6764] New: Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
@ 2008-07-25 6:34 ` srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:46 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com @ 2008-07-25 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com 2008-07-25 06:34 -------
Different scenarios under which system hangs
1) printing pp() inside scheduler_tick() probe handler.
========================================
probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
funcname = pp();
printf("========%s \n",funcname);
}
==============================
2)printing probefunc() inside scheduler_tick() probe handler.
========================================
probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
funcname = probefunc();
printf("========%s \n",funcname);
}
==============================
Different scenarios under which system works well.
1) printing "hello" message and calling probefunc() or pp()(without printing
their value) inside scheduler_tick() probe handler.
========================================
probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
funcname = probefunc();
printf("hello");
}
==============================
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6764
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug runtime/6764] Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system
2008-07-24 10:26 [Bug runtime/6764] New: Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:34 ` [Bug runtime/6764] " srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
@ 2008-07-25 6:46 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2008-07-25 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2008-07-25 06:45 -------
> Different scenarios under which system works well.
> 1) printing "hello" message and calling probefunc() or pp()(without printing
> their value) inside scheduler_tick() probe handler.
> ========================================
> probe kernel.statement(0x000000000003b83c).absolute {
> funcname = probefunc();
> printf("hello");
> }
> ==============================
The unused variable will be optimized, try it with -u. The problem won't exist
on x86, seems specific to s390.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6764
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-25 6:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-24 10:26 [Bug runtime/6764] New: Execution of probefunc.exp causes system hang on s390 system srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:34 ` [Bug runtime/6764] " srinivasa at in dot ibm dot com
2008-07-25 6:46 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).