From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-9692-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20057 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2008 23:40:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 14539 invoked by uid 48); 15 Aug 2008 23:35:25 -0000
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20080815233525.14538.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "mhiramat at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20061207014705.3672.mmlnx@us.ibm.com>
References: <20061207014705.3672.mmlnx@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug translator/3672] Support formatted dump of kernel structures
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2


------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com  2008-08-15 23:35 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Another possible syntax for this is inspired by the $$vars introduced
> recently.  Expanding struct contents could be represented like so:
> 

How about $$$var syntax?
It also could compose $$vars as $$$vars, or $$$parms.
and depth also be increased by adding $. ($$$$var)

>     $var$  =>  a string representation of $var's fields: like
>                0xfoo
>           or   {.foo=0xbeef, .zoo=0xp00}

I like latter format :-)

Thanks,

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3672

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.