public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug translator/6847] $$parms/$$vars should be $$*
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080818145338.14585.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080817132854.6847.mhiramat@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2008-08-18 14:53 -------
> > The "$" *suffix* suggested in bug #3672 was done
> > specifically to avoid namespace collisions of the
> > kind you are looking for here.
> 
> I think this also could simplify the syntax including bug #3672.

Let's just say they are opposing proposals.

> - one $ (ex. $var, $return): returns the value of var or return value.
> - two $ (ex. $$var, $$return, $$*): returns the values with variable names.
> - more than two $ (ex. $$$var, $$$*): returns the values ($ means the depth of
> nesting) with variable names.

One obstacle in this scheme's way is that there are material
differences betewen the various metavariables ($$return,
$$vars, $$parms, $$locals, and perhaps others in the future).
They can't all match "*".  Further, there is interplay with
.return probes' optional saving of invocation-time variables.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6847

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-18 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-17 13:30 [Bug translator/6847] New: " mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-08-17 15:26 ` [Bug translator/6847] " fche at redhat dot com
2008-08-17 20:07 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-08-17 20:12 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-08-18 14:54 ` fche at redhat dot com [this message]
2008-08-18 15:13 ` [Bug translator/6847] $$parms/$$vars should be $$* or $$%parms/$$%vars mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-08-18 15:26 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-08-28 16:09 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080818145338.14585.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).