From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5321 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2008 20:44:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 4084 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2008 20:43:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081001204305.4083.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fche at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20081001203800.6932.mhiramat@redhat.com> References: <20081001203800.6932.mhiramat@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/6932] use synchronize_sched() instead of c->busy checking X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2008-10-01 20:43 ------- We can put in a synchronize_sched() before or after or even into the busy-testing loop. I see no reason to *remove* the busy-testing loop though. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6932 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.