[Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library

public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library
@ 2007-01-11 11:44 masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
  2007-08-07 19:51 ` [Bug runtime/3859] " mhiramat at redhat dot com
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com @ 2007-01-11 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

On the view of Middleware, I think SystemTap should be better to 
provide the interfaces for controlling its behavior. For example,
start/stop/pause tracing, read information, record a special
event and so on.

Thanks,

-- 
           Summary: SystemTap Control Library
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
@ 2007-08-07 19:51 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
  2007-08-22  0:26 ` fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2007-08-07 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mhiramat at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
  2007-08-07 19:51 ` [Bug runtime/3859] " mhiramat at redhat dot com
@ 2007-08-22  0:26 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2007-08-23 21:20 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2007-08-22  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2007-08-21 19:10 -------
Can you think of something that cannot be accomplished by a cleverly
written script using the future facilities from bug #1154 (procfs interaction),
bug #4935 (on-the-fly probe enable/disable)?


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
  2007-08-07 19:51 ` [Bug runtime/3859] " mhiramat at redhat dot com
  2007-08-22  0:26 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2007-08-23 21:20 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
  2007-08-24  0:55 ` fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2007-08-23 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com  2007-08-23 20:55 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can you think of something that cannot be accomplished by a cleverly
> written script using the future facilities from bug #1154 (procfs interaction),
> bug #4935 (on-the-fly probe enable/disable)?

Sure, it seems good idea. I think users can easily cooperate their applications
and scripts if we implement those facilities (especially, procfs interaction).
(I had just thought that systemtap needed a kind of the interface for
cooperating with various user application.)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-23 21:20 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
@ 2007-08-24  0:55 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2007-09-18  1:47 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2007-08-24  0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2007-08-23 22:15 -------
OK, let's suspend this bug, and when the other two are done, we'll close this too.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |1154, 4935
             Status|WAITING                     |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-24  0:55 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2007-09-18  1:47 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  2008-10-11  2:48 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2010-02-26  1:54 ` fche at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2007-09-18  1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap



-- 
Bug 3859 depends on bug 1154, which changed state.

Bug 1154 Summary: procfs interaction tapset
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1154

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-09-18  1:47 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2008-10-11  2:48 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2010-02-26  1:54 ` fche at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-10-11  2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap



-- 
Bug 3859 depends on bug 4935, which changed state.

Bug 4935 Summary: support on-the-fly probe enable/disable syntax
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4935

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/3859] SystemTap Control Library
  2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-11  2:48 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-02-26  1:54 ` fche at redhat dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-02-26  1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2010-02-26 01:54 -------
this can be assembled from procfs and to a lesser extent conditional
probes (see bug #10995).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3859

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-26  1:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-11 11:44 [Bug runtime/3859] New: SystemTap Control Library masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com
2007-08-07 19:51 ` [Bug runtime/3859] " mhiramat at redhat dot com
2007-08-22  0:26 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-08-23 21:20 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2007-08-24  0:55 ` fche at redhat dot com
2007-09-18  1:47 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2008-10-11  2:48 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-26  1:54 ` fche at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).