From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21208 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2008 18:43:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 20929 invoked by uid 48); 23 Oct 2008 18:42:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081023184225.20928.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mjw at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20081020200858.6969.dsmith@redhat.com> References: <20081020200858.6969.dsmith@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/6969] syscall tapset broken on s390x X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2008-10-23 18:42 ------- I reverted the change mentioned in comment #2. It also caused FAIL: 32-bit futimes and FAIL: 32-bit stat on x86 (but not x86_64 in 32-bit mode). With this reverted they PASS on all architectures I tested on. Both semok/nodwf02.stp and semok/nodwf05.stp still PASS. No regressions on x86_64 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 and i686 2.6.26.5-28.fc8. commit b5223457bca23f214fb35f3ffdc372bf67cfe190 Author: Mark Wielaard Date: Thu Oct 23 20:34:42 2008 +0200 Don't use pointer_arg to fetch arguments for syscall utime and compat_utime. Please retest on s390x. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6969 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.