From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-10310-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5468 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2008 13:07:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 28966 invoked by uid 48); 28 Oct 2008 13:06:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:07:00 -0000
From: "mjw at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20081028130624.6991.mjw@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2

2.6.27 introduced sys_paccept() and rewrote sys_accept() to be just a
call-through to do_accept(). In the case sys_socketcall/SYS_ACCEPT is used it
bypasses sys_accept and sys_paccept completely and directly calls do_accept. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/279837/

This means that on i386 at least we are missing any accept syscalls. Resulting
in a FAIL: 32-bit net1 testcase from syscalls.exp.

-- 
           Summary: accept system call missed on 2.6.27
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tapsets
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: mjw at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.