From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15381 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2008 03:36:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 3492 invoked by uid 48); 8 Nov 2008 03:35:09 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081108033509.3491.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mhiramat at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20081028001945.6989.mhiramat@redhat.com> References: <20081028001945.6989.mhiramat@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug kprobes/6989] kprobe_hash_table is too small for systemtap X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com 2008-11-08 03:35 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, since kretprobe_table_locks has been __cacheline_aligned, this change > increases the size of kprobes.o so much (about 64KB!). > It was much larger than I thought. We have to fix this problem... Hmm, if we separate hash bits of kprobe_table and kretprobe_table, the object size wasn't increased so much. text data bss dec hex filename 6610 436 8840 15886 3e0e /home/mhiramat/kbin/2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.o 6621 436 10632 17689 4519 /home/mhiramat/kbin/2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.o -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6989 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.