From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15292 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2008 00:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 4061 invoked by uid 48); 13 Nov 2008 00:46:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081113004648.4059.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mhiramat at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20081001203800.6932.mhiramat@redhat.com> References: <20081001203800.6932.mhiramat@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/6932] c->busy can be removed from kprobe-based handlers X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com 2008-11-13 00:46 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I would prefer to keep c->busy, since it also functions as a > reentrancy-prevention mechanism, not just a shutdown-synchronization > one. By the way, for reentrancy-prevention, we don't need an atomic-operation, because the reentrance always occurs on the same processor... -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|SUSPENDED |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6932 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.