* [Bug translator/5376] New: Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax
@ 2007-11-21 0:21 mhiramat at redhat dot com
2007-11-27 23:04 ` [Bug translator/5376] " mhiramat at redhat dot com
2008-11-28 17:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2007-11-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
- 'probe b* g* n {}' is recognized as 'b*g*n'
- 'probe hoge* if(e) {}' is recognized as 'hoge*if()' (concatenate 'hoge*' and 'if')
- 'probe huga? = hoge {}' is recognized as 'huga = hoge' (? is just ignored)
I think all those cases should be treated as incorrect syntaxes.
Thanks,
--
Summary: Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: translator
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: mhiramat at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5376
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug translator/5376] Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax 2007-11-21 0:21 [Bug translator/5376] New: Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2007-11-27 23:04 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com 2008-11-28 17:08 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2007-11-27 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap ------- Additional Comments From mhiramat at redhat dot com 2007-11-27 23:04 ------- Created an attachment (id=2111) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2111&action=view) A bugfix patch for wildcard parsing. This patch will fix the first and the second issue. With this patch, parser treats '*'(wildcard) in probe points as an alphabet. However, there is a side-effect that this patch allows consecutive wildcards (ex. "probe a** {}"). I'm not sure why the consecutive wildcards have been restricted. I think it could be allowed like as bash. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5376 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug translator/5376] Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax 2007-11-21 0:21 [Bug translator/5376] New: Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax mhiramat at redhat dot com 2007-11-27 23:04 ` [Bug translator/5376] " mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2008-11-28 17:08 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-11-28 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2008-11-28 17:07 ------- commit 1ad820e finally fixes issue 3. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5376 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-28 17:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-11-21 0:21 [Bug translator/5376] New: Stap does not check incorrect probe point syntax mhiramat at redhat dot com 2007-11-27 23:04 ` [Bug translator/5376] " mhiramat at redhat dot com 2008-11-28 17:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).