* [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken
@ 2008-11-25 16:50 fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-02 9:47 ` [Bug runtime/7051] " prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-11-25 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
ksebasti found several issues with this widget:
printf ("%n%4d", 0) prints 0x04 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
printf ("%n%n%n") prints junk
printf ("%n") prints junk
If we keep %n around at all, it needs to compose sensibly.
We could make it mean "total record length", so that the
previous three cases would print
printf ("%n%4d", 0) would print 0x05 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
printf ("%n%n%n") would print 0x03 0x03 0x03
printf ("%n") would print 0x01
--
Summary: printf %n directive broken
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: runtime
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] printf %n directive broken
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
@ 2008-12-02 9:47 ` prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-02 9:49 ` prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com @ 2008-12-02 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2008-12-02 09:45 -------
Waiting for feedback on whether %n directive should be continued with...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] printf %n directive broken
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-02 9:47 ` [Bug runtime/7051] " prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
@ 2008-12-02 9:49 ` prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-02 18:06 ` [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com @ 2008-12-02 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2008-12-02 09:41 -------
I'm not too sure if %n is useful enough to be retained..
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-02 9:47 ` [Bug runtime/7051] " prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-02 9:49 ` prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
@ 2008-12-02 18:06 ` fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-05 19:12 ` ksebasti at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2008-12-02 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2008-12-02 18:03 -------
If there is no dissent, let's get rid of it.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-12-02 18:03:43
date| |
Summary|printf %n directive broken |remove broken printf %n
| |directive support
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-02 18:06 ` [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support fche at redhat dot com
@ 2008-12-05 19:12 ` ksebasti at redhat dot com
2008-12-29 19:23 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-29 19:24 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ksebasti at redhat dot com @ 2008-12-05 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From ksebasti at redhat dot com 2008-12-05 19:09 -------
removed as of commit 89b011d52e247d9a3933b5d37af72de4d44212bd
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-05 19:12 ` ksebasti at redhat dot com
@ 2008-12-29 19:23 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-29 19:24 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com @ 2008-12-29 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2008-12-29 18:34 -------
Table-1 in langreg.pdf needs to be corrected to indicate the absence of %n
printf specifier.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 19:23 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
@ 2008-12-29 19:24 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com @ 2008-12-29 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |prasad at linux dot vnet dot
| |ibm dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7051
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-29 18:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-25 16:50 [Bug runtime/7051] New: printf %n directive broken fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-02 9:47 ` [Bug runtime/7051] " prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-02 9:49 ` prerna at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-02 18:06 ` [Bug runtime/7051] remove broken printf %n directive support fche at redhat dot com
2008-12-05 19:12 ` ksebasti at redhat dot com
2008-12-29 19:23 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2008-12-29 19:24 ` prasad at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).