* [Bug runtime/9866] New: save_stack_trace code in runtime stack* needs more than CONFIG_STACKTRACE
@ 2009-02-19 12:16 fche at redhat dot com
2009-03-01 11:11 ` [Bug runtime/9866] " fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-02-19 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
The API in linux/stacktrace.h has drifted somewhat. If
the runtime is to retain compatibility with RHEL5-era 2.6.18,
autoconf- or KERNEL_VERSION-based checks are needed.
Related, dump_trace() does not seem necessary as we can
also invoke address->symbol-name mappings in the runtime
proper.
--
Summary: save_stack_trace code in runtime stack* needs more than
CONFIG_STACKTRACE
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: runtime
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
CC: timoore at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug runtime/9866] save_stack_trace code in runtime stack* needs more than CONFIG_STACKTRACE
2009-02-19 12:16 [Bug runtime/9866] New: save_stack_trace code in runtime stack* needs more than CONFIG_STACKTRACE fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-03-01 11:11 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-01 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-02-28 20:43 -------
Part of the responsibility of committing code to the runtime
is keeping it buildable as kernels change.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|timoore at redhat dot com |
AssignedTo|systemtap at sources dot |timoore at redhat dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-28 20:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-19 12:16 [Bug runtime/9866] New: save_stack_trace code in runtime stack* needs more than CONFIG_STACKTRACE fche at redhat dot com
2009-03-01 11:11 ` [Bug runtime/9866] " fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).