public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/9935] New: New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments
@ 2009-03-09 13:46 mjw at redhat dot com
  2009-03-09 15:59 ` [Bug testsuite/9935] " scox at redhat dot com
  2009-03-09 16:09 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-09 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

testsuite/systemtap.base/std.exp succeeds compiling, but fails running because
any mark probes with more than 4 arguments prints its $argN (N>4) as zero. The
test is currently marked as untested.

-- 
           Summary: New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4
                    arguments
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: mjw at redhat dot com
                CC: scox at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/9935] New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments
  2009-03-09 13:46 [Bug testsuite/9935] New: New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2009-03-09 15:59 ` scox at redhat dot com
  2009-03-09 16:09 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-09 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From scox at redhat dot com  2009-03-09 15:43 -------
arg4, arg5, ..., arg10 have a missing '$' :-)


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/9935] New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments
  2009-03-09 13:46 [Bug testsuite/9935] New: New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments mjw at redhat dot com
  2009-03-09 15:59 ` [Bug testsuite/9935] " scox at redhat dot com
@ 2009-03-09 16:09 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-09 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2009-03-09 15:49 -------
Doh... Fixed as:

commit fd0143174d30451c99fde61d719d2eaa53730ff6
Author: Mark Wielaard <mark@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>
Date:   Mon Mar 9 16:48:13 2009 +0100

    PR9935. Fixed stap script typos. arg[5-10] -> $arg[5-10].
    
    * testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.exp: Enable stap_run2 when installtest_p.
    * testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.stp: Fixed all arg to $arg typos.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-09 15:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-09 13:46 [Bug testsuite/9935] New: New sdt.exp test fails for mark probes with more than 4 arguments mjw at redhat dot com
2009-03-09 15:59 ` [Bug testsuite/9935] " scox at redhat dot com
2009-03-09 16:09 ` mjw at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).