* [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites
@ 2009-03-24 16:57 fche at redhat dot com
2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com
2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-24 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469054
A prereq on kernel-devel is easily justified, iff yum & fedora kernels actually
do the right thing with that (and get the right flavour or kernel-FOO-devel
installed).
--
Summary: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo
requisites
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: releng
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/9994] modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites
2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-04-08 18:14 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-04-08 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-08 18:14 -------
kernel-devel is now a prereq;
still considering whether/how to prereq kernel-debuginfo
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/9994] modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites
2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com
2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-12 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:36 -------
With the librpm extensions in the translator, leading to 'debuginfo-install foo'
suggestions, we probably don't need further .spec hackery.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-12 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com
2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com
2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).