* [Bug documentation/6819] New: stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints
@ 2008-08-05 22:54 jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2009-03-27 20:10 ` [Bug documentation/6819] " fche at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 14:33 ` jistone at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com @ 2008-08-05 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
The stapprobes(5) man page says:
These are all syntactically valid probe points:
...
syscall(22)
user.inode("/bin/vi").statement(0x2222)
...
These may be valid syntactically, but not semantically -- i.e., they're not
known to the translator or defined in any tapset. So they're confusing to new
users. The user.inode example could now be replaced with a
process("/bin/vi")... example.
--
Summary: stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: documentation
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6819
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug documentation/6819] stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints
2008-08-05 22:54 [Bug documentation/6819] New: stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2009-03-27 20:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 14:33 ` jistone at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-27 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-03-27 16:15 -------
commit e904ad9
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6819
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug documentation/6819] stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints
2008-08-05 22:54 [Bug documentation/6819] New: stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2009-03-27 20:10 ` [Bug documentation/6819] " fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-04-30 14:33 ` jistone at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-04-30 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com 2010-04-28 22:14 -------
Fixed by Frank's commit.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6819
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-28 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-05 22:54 [Bug documentation/6819] New: stapprobes(5) - syntactically (in)valid probepoints jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com
2009-03-27 20:10 ` [Bug documentation/6819] " fche at redhat dot com
2010-04-30 14:33 ` jistone at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).