* [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites @ 2009-03-24 16:57 fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-24 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469054 A prereq on kernel-devel is easily justified, iff yum & fedora kernels actually do the right thing with that (and get the right flavour or kernel-FOO-devel installed). -- Summary: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites Product: systemtap Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: releng AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/9994] modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites 2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-04-08 18:14 ` fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-04-08 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-08 18:14 ------- kernel-devel is now a prereq; still considering whether/how to prereq kernel-debuginfo -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/9994] modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites 2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-12 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:36 ------- With the librpm extensions in the translator, leading to 'debuginfo-install foo' suggestions, we probably don't need further .spec hackery. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9994 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-12 17:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-03-24 16:57 [Bug releng/9994] New: modify .spec file to advise on kernel-devel / -debuginfo requisites fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-08 18:14 ` [Bug releng/9994] " fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).