From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21265 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2009 18:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 21067 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2009 18:58:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090414185804.21066.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051216211044.2064.jkenisto@us.ibm.com> References: <20051216211044.2064.jkenisto@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug kprobes/2064] Support pagepoint probes X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com 2009-04-14 18:58 ------- Subject: Re: Support pagepoint probes On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 17:17 +0000, fche at redhat dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-04-14 17:17 ------- > Is this duplicated by bug #6883 (kmmio hooks)? > > kmmio hooks is #6983, not #6883. And I think that the two PRs address substantially different things (memory-mapped I/O versus hardware breakpoints) -- although the kmmio mechanism might be useful in implementing #2064. Jim -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2064 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.