From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4099 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2009 20:48:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4091 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2009 20:48:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:47:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3UKX5uL006569; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:33:35 -0400 Received: from gateway.sf.frob.com (vpn-12-147.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.147]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3UKX3b5021458; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:33:04 -0400 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E740357B; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by magilla.sf.frob.com (Postfix, from userid 5281) id 5FFA0FC3BF; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: David Smith Cc: Maynard Johnson , systemtap@sourceware.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" Subject: Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point In-Reply-To: David Smith's message of Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:59:57 -0500 <49F9E71D.2070500@redhat.com> References: <49D3E3DF.1000108@us.ibm.com> <49F61D09.8090503@redhat.com> <49F8C1C0.8070208@us.ibm.com> <49F9E71D.2070500@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20090430203302.5FFA0FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:48:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 > Off the top of my head that might mean there is a specific ppc64 utrace > problem. > > Roland, do you know of any problems with original utrace doing > UTRACE_ACTION_SINGLESTEP on ppc64? Sorry, I can't remember anything in particular. There might well have been some issue that I've forgotten. Thanks, Roland