public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27
@ 2008-10-28 13:07 mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-10-30 11:34 ` [Bug tapsets/6991] " mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2008-10-28 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

2.6.27 introduced sys_paccept() and rewrote sys_accept() to be just a
call-through to do_accept(). In the case sys_socketcall/SYS_ACCEPT is used it
bypasses sys_accept and sys_paccept completely and directly calls do_accept. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/279837/

This means that on i386 at least we are missing any accept syscalls. Resulting
in a FAIL: 32-bit net1 testcase from syscalls.exp.

-- 
           Summary: accept system call missed on 2.6.27
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tapsets
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: mjw at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/6991] accept system call missed on 2.6.27
  2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2008-10-30 11:34 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-11-14 10:27 ` mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2008-10-30 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2008-10-30 11:33 -------
Note that there is another rewrite underway to reintroduce accept4:
http://lwn.net/Articles/304767/ It hasn't hit the upstream kernel yet. But
should be watched to make sure any fix to accept syscall tracing hooks into the
right place.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/6991] accept system call missed on 2.6.27
  2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-10-30 11:34 ` [Bug tapsets/6991] " mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2008-11-14 10:27 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-11-14 10:29 ` mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2008-11-14 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2008-11-14 10:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=3063)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3063&action=view)
fedora srpm elfutils-0.137-fixes.patch


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/6991] accept system call missed on 2.6.27
  2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-10-30 11:34 ` [Bug tapsets/6991] " mjw at redhat dot com
  2008-11-14 10:27 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2008-11-14 10:29 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2009-05-13 14:05 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2009-11-02 20:15 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2008-11-14 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2008-11-14 10:27 -------
Sorry, ignore that attachment, wrong bug.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/6991] accept system call missed on 2.6.27
  2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-14 10:29 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2009-05-13 14:05 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2009-11-02 20:15 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2009-05-13 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2009-05-13 14:05 -------
(From update of attachment 3063)
wrong attachement, not for this bug


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #3063 is|0                           |1
           obsolete|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/6991] accept system call missed on 2.6.27
  2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-05-13 14:05 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-02 20:15 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-02 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From dsmith at redhat dot com  2009-11-02 20:15 -------
Fixed in commit 9f61c5d by adding support for sys_accept4.  The net1 test now
passes on 32-bit & 64-bit versions of f11 (2.6.30.9-90) and rhel5
(2.6.18-164.2.1.el5).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6991

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-02 20:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-28 13:07 [Bug tapsets/6991] New: accept system call missed on 2.6.27 mjw at redhat dot com
2008-10-30 11:34 ` [Bug tapsets/6991] " mjw at redhat dot com
2008-11-14 10:27 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2008-11-14 10:29 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2009-05-13 14:05 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2009-11-02 20:15 ` dsmith at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).